Chapters 6 and 7 of Subjects Matter reinforced the need for
reading and comprehension strategies and then began to establish how having a
community of learners can help our classrooms.
Some of the advice that stuck with me regarded how we, as the teachers,
need to filter our textbooks. There is
no need for the students to read every word in a textbook and this is even
advised against. Reading every word would not engage any student, never mind help to foster a love for the content. This is why it is very important that we know
our textbooks inside and out. Knowing
exactly what is inside helps us to decide exactly what is most important for
our classrooms. This might not be the same
for everyone, but with only 180 days at our disposal, its important to have an
opinion on what are the central concepts of the course.
Another great piece of advice is to
know exactly what are on those “big tests”.
For now anyway, it is clear that what is tested by the standardized
tests needs to come first. We still have
room to explore and supplement, and we absolutely should, but leaving out
something that will be tested on in exchange for a fun activity could be
disastrous. One of our responsibilities
in the current educational climate is to become masters of the standardized
assessments. This idea is actually very
in line with UbD and backwards design.
If our students are going to be taking these tests, we should start
by examining the assessment, and then craft our lessons based on what we know is on the test. Planning this way
allows for teachers to prepare students for the standardized tests while
hopefully making an effort to craft interesting and engaging learning
experiences. Last summer I took a course
on teaching Calculus with Dr. Humphreys, and she also stressed the importance
of becoming an expert on the test we are preparing our students for. The AP tests are very different from PARCC,
but the lesson is still the same. If I
am not absolutely sure of what is going to be on the big test at the end of the
year, how can I make sure my students are ready for it?
I also
really appreciated the shoutout to how math textbooks are very different from
the rest in Chapter 6. As I have been
doing all the readings this semester, I keep thinking “But my math books are
going to be so different, does this really apply? Or how can I change this so it does apply?” Reading this section just makes
it even clearer that I need to really focus on these comprehension strategies
to make the math textbook digestible for students. Part of why students have such a hard time
with them is definitely because how different they are from the rest of the
textbooks! Reading on their own, if a
student does not understand a sentence somewhere along the line in their
history book, they will probably still be ok.
They can still take away the main ideas from understanding everything
else in the reading. In math however,
not understanding one sentence might handicap a student for that whole section,
that whole unit, or depending on the sentence, the whole course. This is a very serious matter and I need to do something that I did not expect I would be doing as a math teacher before this semester. I need to arm myself with a
full arsenal of reading and comprehension strategies and employ them every day.
While reading
Chapter 7, I was immediately reminded of an article I read last semester while
“Catching the News” in Dr. Brell’s class.
“Teaching in the Shadow of the Ferguson Shooting” was written by Inda
Schaenen and appeared on edweek.org last September 4th. In the article, Mrs. Schaenen explores all
the difficulties she will face teaching her 8th grade language arts
class this year. She knows that the
children do not feel safe in their community.
Many of the students deal with the events in seemingly odd ways, even
going so far as re-enacting Michael Brown’s shooting in the school. What I really took away from reading this was
that these children are not going to be able to learn until they feel safe
again. They have way too much on their
minds and way too much to be worried about to focus on their notebooks, worksheets, and textbooks. None of that matters to them when they are
afraid.
In Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, you need each bottom layer to have the layer on top. Without food and water, a person can not feel security and so on. Bringing this ideology into the classroom, we see that "achieving one's full potential" is at the very top. Before students can learn, they need to have the basic needs, feel safe at home and at school, and feel like they belong. As teachers, we need to try our very best to making sure that all our students feel safe and included. If a student feels like he or she really belongs in their math class then they will start to succeed.
I really
believe that a classroom community needs to come first and then learning comes
second. And when learning comes second,
it is more efficient and more powerful.
Daniels and Zemelman back up this point saying “In schools where
teachers explicitly taught the social skills of small-group interaction, the
students gained an average of 11 percent on both their course grades and on
high-stakes standardized tests given in their state.” (Pg. 203-204) When students feel safe, then they can focus
on all the other things. When students
aren’t worried about being made fun of, aren’t embarrassed to make a mistake,
aren’t thinking about whether the bully will stop them in the hall today, that
is when they can get excited about learning something new. Something that I want to do with my classes
and something that I think about a lot is turning my classrooms into
teams. I am still not even close to
having a fully realized idea, but I know this is something that I will develop
and I will put into practice. I never
want to really have a “class”. “Class” can have a
tendency to invoke an image of desks in rows, children working silently, and a
teacher in command. I want to have teams
where the players learn together and understand the benefits of helping one another
and working for a greater good. I want
to be the coach of this team. Someone
who knows the game of math and can help them execute all the strategies. I hope that doing this will bring my students
and myself closer together and create a space where cooperative learning can
take place.
I too agreed that we need to filter our textbooks and know what is inside them. We need to take the time to know what our textbooks have to offer and then decide which information is most valuable students. Too often is it that we assign entire text books to students that they will most likely forget within a week after reading it if not immediately after. Its time we take a stand and take ownership of our textbooks. We decide what to enrich our students heads with. Only then can out students grow and flourish.
ReplyDeleteP.s. Sorry about all of the type-o's!
ReplyDeleteHa! Thank you, Bryan, for proving my point: 'Hierarchy' is a Tier 2 word :]
ReplyDeleteI'll be interested to know if you come up with a plan to create your community of teams. Interesting idea. Much better than having rows of desks and a teacher at the helm. Boring. I find math to be a little more cut and dry than other areas. Why would a math teacher filter a math book? Isn't everything in a sequence?
ReplyDeleteWell for example when students are learning trigonometry this book will go through this huge explanation of the ratios stretching it out over several sections. For the students reading this has no point when there is one simple proof of the unit circle that can explain it all. After that having students memorize the 1st quadrant values then applying these values to the rest of the unit circle using reference angles is a much more efficient method than having a whole section talk about sine, then a whole section about cosine and so on. A lot of times condensing the material will actually make it more clear for students.
Delete